Before we enter the music, we need a philosophical key. Throughout this series, we will return again and again to a single idea — one that I will call, borrowing from a article I read, the principle of "I Am I". It is worth spending a few minutes on what this means and why it matters for jazz in particular.
The conventional ways we describe identity are relational and functional. A musician is identified by genre, by instrument, by influence, by record label, by era. An employee is identified by role and rank. A person is identified by the names others give them: parent, professional, patriot, patient. All of these are versions of "I am X" — I am defined by my relationship to something outside myself. The institution, the tradition, the market, the expectation.
The theological counterpoint appears in Exodus, when Moses asks the voice from the burning bush for its name. The answer given — rendered in the King James as "I AM THAT I AM" — refuses every functional definition. No role, no relationship, no external reference point. Pure self-sufficient being. Identity that requires nothing outside itself for its validity. This is not arrogance. It is the opposite — the complete release of the need for external confirmation.
A US academic journal article I encountered proposed that Jesus's self-declarations follow two patterns: the familiar relational ones — I am the shepherd, the vine, the bread, the way — and one which stands apart: the bare I am, connecting directly back to Exodus, to the divine name itself. The argument was that this unmodified declaration was the most radical claim of all precisely because it claimed nothing. No function. No usefulness. Simply: I am I.
Han Shan was a hermit poet of the Tang dynasty who lived on a mountain called Cold Mountain — we don't know his real name; "Han Shan" simply means the mountain he lived on. He may have been a failed scholar. He may have been a Buddhist monk. He may have been a madman. His poems were found scratched on rocks and tree bark and the walls of a mountain shelter. Nobody knows how many he wrote. About three hundred survive.
Gary Snyder — the American poet, Zen practitioner, and last surviving connection to the Beat Generation at ninety-five years old as of this writing — translated Han Shan's poems into English in the late 1950s, publishing them alongside his own collection Riprap (1965). The pairing was not accidental. Snyder's "riprap" — the practice of laying rough stones to make a mountain path — is a physical discipline that mirrors Han Shan's poetic one: working with what is there, without ornament, until the work and the worker become the same thing.
One of the Cold Mountain poems describes arriving at the centre of the mountain and finding, at the still point, nothing. Not emptiness as absence — emptiness as pure presence, undivided and undivided-from. Scholars of Snyder note that this is his translation that most directly echoes the Zen concept of mushin — no-mind, the state in which the practitioner acts without the interference of a self-watching-itself-act. The mountain is there. The poet is there. The poem is there. No separation between them.
This is I Am I in its most ancient and stripped-down form.
For the purposes of these lectures, "I Am I" describes a quality of creative selfhood that operates without dependence on external definition. Three versions will recur: I Am I as refusal — the beboppers at Minton's refusing to be entertainment; I Am I as becoming — Coltrane's continuous self-transcendence; and I Am I as silence — the Han Shan and ECM version, in which the self becomes so fully present it disappears into the work. All three are related. All three appear in jazz. The question we will ask of each musician and each movement is not "how technically advanced was this?" but "how present was the person?"
One further concept needs naming, because it appears throughout jazz history as the shadow side of creative sovereignty: Ketman. The term comes from the Polish poet Czesław Miłosz, who borrowed it from a Persian Sufi tradition. It describes the act of concealing one's true beliefs while performing compliance with a dominant ideology — wearing the mask so well that you survive, and preserving the inner self intact beneath it. In jazz, Ketman takes many forms: the Black musician playing sweet swing for white ballrooms while playing bebop after hours; the avant-garde musician taking a commercial session to pay the rent; the radical who accepts a teaching position at a music conservatory. Ketman is not betrayal. It is, in our terms, the tea house along the road — you stop there when the weather demands it, you use what it offers. But it is not the destination. The destination is I Am I. The musicians who mistake the tea house for the destination — who let the mask become the face — are the ones whose music becomes merely competent, merely professional, merely jazz.
With that map in hand, let us enter the music.
Let's begin with a distinction. Swing was democratic entertainment, built for the body — for dancing, for crowds, for commerce. It was, in every sense of the word, institutional music. The big bands were corporations of sound: arranged, predictable, owned by record labels and booking agents, aimed at white audiences who could afford the ballrooms.
Bebop was a refusal.
God gave Noah the rainbow sign — no more water, the fire next time.
— Black American spiritual, quoted as epigraph to James Baldwin, The Fire Next Time (1963)Before we enter the music itself, we need a witness. James Baldwin — novelist, essayist, expatriate, prophet — was twenty years old in 1944 and living in Greenwich Village, working whatever jobs he could find, moving between the downtown white intellectual world and the Harlem he had grown up in. He was not a jazz musician. But he understood, with a precision that most music critics never approached, what jazz was doing and why.
For Baldwin, the blues and its descendants were not simply musical forms. They were the only honest language available in a country built on lies about race. To play the blues — or to play bebop, which was the blues pushed through a higher intellectual pressure — was to insist on the reality of your own experience in the face of a society that denied it. It was to say: what happened to me happened. I am not what you need me to be. I am what I am.
This is "I Am I" stated not as philosophy but as survival. And it is the ground beneath everything that happens at Minton's Playhouse in 1942.
There is a second figure who belongs in any account of Harlem in these years, and who offers the most dramatic biographical parallel in American history to what jazz was doing musically. Malcolm Little arrived in New York City in 1943 at seventeen years old. He was a hustler and a dancer — famously skilled at the Lindy Hop, frequenting the Savoy Ballroom on 140th Street, a few blocks from Minton's. He moved through the same streets, the same hours, the same world as the beboppers, though they were not the same people. He was arrested in 1946 and sent to prison. In prison he underwent a conversion to the Nation of Islam, educated himself with the ferocity of a man who had been denied an education, changed his name to Malcolm X — the X replacing the slave name — and emerged in 1952 as a completely different person. Then, in 1964, after his break with the Nation of Islam, he made the Hajj to Mecca, encountered Islam in its full human diversity, and in the weeks before his assassination in February 1965 was becoming a different person again: El-Hajj Malik El-Shabazz, a man whose thinking had outrun every category anyone had tried to put him in.
Detroit Red → Malcolm X → El-Hajj Malik El-Shabazz. Three complete identity transformations, each one a total dissolution of the previous self, each one driven from the inside outward. This is the biographical enactment of what Miles Davis was doing musically across the same decades — the relentless refusal to be fixed by any previous identity. Jazz and Malcolm were not the same project. But they were answers to the same question: in a country that tells you exactly what you are and intends to keep you there, how do you become what you actually are?
The young musicians who gathered at Minton's Playhouse in Harlem — Charlie Parker, Dizzy Gillespie, Thelonious Monk, Kenny Clarke, later Miles Davis as a nineteen-year-old observer — were not trying to create a new genre. They were trying to create music that could not be easily appropriated, commodified, or danced to. The tempos were too fast. The harmonies were too complex. The solos were too long and too idiosyncratic. It was, from one angle, an act of intellectual and economic self-defence by Black musicians who had watched their art form made profitable for everyone except themselves.
Parker, called "Bird," is the central figure of bebop not merely because of his virtuosity — though that was superhuman — but because of the nature of his musical personality. His solos are not ornamental. They are arguments. Each phrase builds, displaces, returns, and transforms its material with a logic that sounds simultaneously inevitable and completely surprising.
He was also, famously, self-destructive. Heroin addiction, hospitalisation at Camarillo State, erratic behaviour, a capacity for cruelty alongside the genius. There is something significant in this: Bird lived in radical extremity. The music was the I Am I in full sovereign force — but the life struggled to contain it.
In 1945, Parker and Gillespie recorded "Ko-Ko" in a single afternoon session for Savoy Records. The producer, Teddy Reig, watched Parker improvise a contrafact over the chord changes of "Cherokee" at a tempo so fast that the other musicians could barely keep up. Afterwards, Reig reportedly asked Parker what the song was about. Parker looked at him and said simply, "Everything." The recording time listed was two minutes and fifty-three seconds. The reverberations have lasted eighty years.
The bebop soloist, at their best, is the closest thing jazz has produced to the pure "I Am I" utterance. Swing, like institutional identity, defines you by your function — I am the trumpet section, I am the arrangement, I am here to serve the dancer. The bebop improviser says instead: I am what I am playing, right now, and it has never existed before and will never exist again. The solo is not a role. It is an event of selfhood. Parker's solos don't sound like a musician performing bebop; they sound like Parker happening.
The 1950s in jazz are often misread as a period of consolidation after bebop's revolution. In fact they were a period of extraordinary creative diversity — arguably the richest single decade the music has produced. Two dominant poles defined the conversation: the "Cool" school that emerged from Miles Davis's 1949–50 recordings and the predominantly Black "Hard Bop" movement that began around 1954–55 as a conscious re-rooting in blues and gospel.
The nine-piece ensemble that Davis assembled for a series of Capitol Records sessions in 1949 was an anomaly in almost every respect. It included a French horn (unusual), a tuba (unheard of in jazz), and arrangements by Gil Evans, Gerry Mulligan, John Lewis, and others that treated improvisation and composition as equals rather than container and content. The sound was airy, detached, cerebral — the opposite of bebop's urgency.
"The Birth of the Cool" — assembled as a ten-inch LP in 1954 from those scattered sessions — became the founding document of West Coast Cool jazz. Musicians like Dave Brubeck, Paul Desmond, Chet Baker, and Gerry Mulligan took the aesthetic toward a lighter, more European sound that proved extremely commercially viable, especially to college audiences.
Davis is unique in jazz history: the only figure who managed to be genuinely central to five or six distinctly different periods of the music. He was present at bebop's birth as a sideman, created Cool, led the modal revolution with Kind of Blue, shattered everything with electric jazz at the end of the sixties, then retreated for five years and returned again.
This constant reinvention makes Miles the most interesting case study for the "I Am I" question. Was each Miles a genuine selfhood? Or was the reinvention itself the identity — the relentless refusal to be defined by any previous achievement? He famously refused to look back, refused nostalgia, refused to play his old music. "I don't play what I know," he said. "I play what I hear."
During the recording of Kind of Blue in 1959, Davis handed his musicians sketch scores — modal scales with almost no written melody — on the morning of each session. Many of the tracks were first takes. Bill Evans, the pianist, later described standing in the studio looking at his sheet and thinking he must be missing something. He wasn't. The concept was that the music would be completely spontaneous within very broad modal parameters. The result was so naturally flowing that listeners assumed it was extensively rehearsed. "Flamenco Sketches," possibly the most beautiful track, was improvised in a single take over five modal scales. The total recording time for the entire album was nine hours.
If Miles represents cool intellectual control, Charles Mingus represents the opposite principle: the full, unmediated eruption of a complex and enraged personality through music. His compositions are autobiographical in an almost embarrassingly direct way — "Fables of Faubus" is a portrait of Arkansas Governor Orval Faubus who blocked school integration; "Goodbye Pork Pie Hat" is an elegy for Lester Young; "The Black Saint and the Sinner Lady" is a forty-minute therapy session in musical form.
Mingus was famous for stopping concerts mid-performance to berate inattentive audiences. He fired sidemen on stage. He weighed 300 pounds and once physically threw a trombone player off the stage. He wrote a 500-page autobiography called Beneath the Underdog that reads more like a surrealist novel. And the music — the music is the most emotionally complex and compositionally ambitious in hard bop, the genre he essentially defined.
Cool jazz presents an interesting philosophical problem: its very refinement and detachment can be read as Ketman — the performance of a self through aesthetic distance. Chet Baker's cool was also a mask; beneath it, his life was chaos, heroin, violence, a beautiful tragic arc. Mingus, by contrast, was pathologically incapable of Ketman. What you saw was what you got, amplified. His music could not be separated from his person. That is either the fullest expression of "I Am I" or its most dangerous manifestation — the self so present that it becomes ungovernable.
Coltrane arrived on the national stage as a sideman with Miles Davis in 1955. He was already a formidable technician, but his early playing had a rough quality — Miles famously asked him why he played solos so long, and Coltrane reportedly said he didn't know how to stop. Miles told him to take the horn out of his mouth. It became one of jazz history's most revealing exchanges.
In 1957, Coltrane had a spiritual awakening he later described as being freed from addiction to heroin and alcohol through a religious experience. The music changed immediately and permanently. The sheet became a prayer. The saxophone became a vehicle for something he never adequately found words to describe.
The 1960 album Giant Steps presented jazz musicians with a harmonic system so novel that most of them simply could not play over it in real time. The "Coltrane changes" — a cycle of major thirds that moved through three key centres — created a density of harmonic movement that forced improvisation to operate at a completely different cognitive level. Pianist Tommy Flanagan, recording the title track, audibly struggles in his solo; the changes were moving faster than his ear could process.
What Coltrane had done was create a harmonic language so personal and so demanding that it simultaneously opened new doors for advanced players and closed the door to anyone who hadn't absorbed it completely. It was the musical equivalent of a private language — except that private languages, Wittgenstein notwithstanding, can sometimes be learned.
After the recording session for A Love Supreme in December 1964, Coltrane returned home and wrote a poem — a prayer of dedication that was included in the album's liner notes. It ends: "Yes, it is true — 'seek and ye shall find.' 'Ask and it shall be given.' Lord, whatever I may be — whatever I am — help me to be better and in being better, help others to be better." The album sold half a million copies in its first year — an almost unimaginable commercial achievement for a suite of devotional improvised music in four parts. It remains one of the best-selling jazz albums ever recorded.
To understand what Coltrane was doing in 1964 and 1965, you have to understand what America was doing in 1964 and 1965. A Love Supreme was recorded in December 1964. Three months earlier, in September 1963, four Black girls had been killed in the bombing of the 16th Street Baptist Church in Birmingham, Alabama. Coltrane wrote a piece in response — "Alabama" — that is possibly the most devastating piece of music in the American canon: a slow, chant-like lament that follows the cadences of Martin Luther King's eulogy for the four girls so precisely that it functions as a musical sermon. James Baldwin, watching from Paris where he had been living for years, wrote that same year the long essay that would become The Fire Next Time — a sustained prophecy about race and America that ends not with hope but with a warning derived from that old Black spiritual: no more water, the fire next time.
And on February 21, 1965, two months after A Love Supreme was released, Malcolm X was assassinated at the Audubon Ballroom in Washington Heights. He was thirty-nine years old. Coltrane knew who he was. The musicians knew who he was. Malcolm and Coltrane were the same generation, responding to the same country with the same refusal to accept the identity it assigned them — one through political speech, one through sound. When Coltrane recorded Ascension six months later — eleven musicians, thirty-eight minutes of collective fire — the political atmosphere was inseparable from the music. This was not protest music in any conventional sense. It was something closer to what Baldwin described in his essay "Many Thousands Gone": the attempt to speak the full truth of a human experience that official culture was designed to silence.
Baldwin wrote directly about jazz and blues only occasionally, but when he did the clarity was absolute. In his 1951 essay "Many Thousands Gone" he described the blues as the record of an experience so total and so refused by the dominant culture that it had to find its own form — the music was not about the experience, it was the experience, transformed into something that could be shared and survived. By the time of The Fire Next Time, published the same year Coltrane released A Love Supreme, Baldwin was saying something Coltrane's music was also saying: that the spiritual hunger at the centre of Black American life was not a pathology to be cured by integration. It was a wisdom that America itself desperately needed and was not yet capable of receiving. Coltrane's four-part suite — Acknowledgement, Resolution, Pursuance, Psalm — traces exactly this arc. The fire is real. The love is the answer to the fire. Neither cancels the other.
After A Love Supreme, Coltrane moved into territory that bewildered even devoted followers. The "classic quartet" — McCoy Tyner on piano, Jimmy Garrison on bass, Elvin Jones on drums — began dissolving. He added second saxophone players, percussionists, and moved toward improvisation of such length and intensity that concerts sometimes lasted hours. He was deeply interested in Ravi Shankar's Indian music, in African music, in Albert Ayler's free playing.
The 1966 album Meditations and the posthumously released concert recordings show a musician who had stepped completely outside the jazz tradition as it was then understood. The music is not free in the sense of chaotic. It is structured by something, but that something is interior and unshared — closer to a meditator's practice than a performer's art.
He died in July 1967 of liver cancer at forty years old. He had been recording and performing intensively until the final weeks.
My music is the spiritual expression of what I am — my faith, my knowledge, my being. When you begin to see the possibilities of music, you desire to do something really good for people, to help humanity free itself from its hang-ups.
— John ColtraneColtrane's entire career is structured around the "I Am I" principle, but in a particular form — the "becoming" rather than the "being." He was never satisfied with what he had achieved because the self he was expressing was always larger than the music he had so far made. This is the spiritual-philosophical tradition of apophatic theology: you cannot say what God is, only what God is not. Coltrane's music is apophatic improvisation — each new album is a refusal of the previous one not because it was wrong but because the self exceeded it. The destination was not a style or a technique but an encounter with something he could only gesture toward.
The album that named the movement was Ornette Coleman's Free Jazz from 1960: two quartets playing simultaneously, independently, for thirty-six minutes. The cover was a reproduction of a Jackson Pollock painting. If you listen to it expecting conventional jazz pleasure — melody, changes, clear solos — you will be disappointed. If you listen to it as thirty-six minutes of human beings in simultaneous conversation with complete freedom and responsibility, it becomes something extraordinary and somewhat frightening.
Coleman was perhaps the most theoretically ambitious musician in jazz history. He developed a personal philosophy he called "harmolodics" — a system in which melody, harmony, speed, rhythm, and motion were all treated as equal and interchangeable. In practice this meant that every instrument in his ensemble could play melody, could play "out of key," could lead or follow without pre-arrangement.
He was also almost entirely self-taught, which gave his playing a quality that formal musicians found unsettling. He did not hold the alto saxophone in the correct embouchure. He made sounds that were "wrong" by conservatory standards — cries, bent notes, timbres that sounded like a voice more than an instrument. This was not incompetence. It was a different set of choices entirely.
When Ornette Coleman opened at the Five Spot Cafe in New York City in November 1959, the jazz world split immediately into two hostile camps. Miles Davis said Coleman was "all screwed up inside." Roy Eldridge said he was faking. But Leonard Bernstein, Gunther Schuller, and composer Virgil Thomson were enthusiastic. Composer, theorist, and conductor Schuller wrote that Coleman was "extending the tradition in the most logical and inevitable way possible." The engagement sold out for weeks. Customers included Norman Mailer, Allen Ginsberg, and various abstract expressionist painters who recognised something familiar in the sound. The musicians playing with Coleman — Don Cherry, Charlie Haden, Billy Higgins — later said the music felt completely natural to them from the first rehearsal.
In Chicago in 1965, a group of African American musicians formed the Association for the Advancement of Creative Musicians. The AACM was unlike anything in jazz history: a self-determining collective that operated its own performance spaces, ran free music education programs for neighbourhood children, released its own recordings, and declared independence from the commercial music industry entirely.
Musicians who came through the AACM include Muhal Richard Abrams, Anthony Braxton, the Art Ensemble of Chicago (Lester Bowie, Roscoe Mitchell, Malachi Favors, Joseph Jarman, Don Moye), Leo Smith, and Henry Threadgill. Their music ranged from noise to lyricism, from African percussion to European avant-garde, often within a single performance. They wore costumes — African ceremonial dress mixed with work clothes and face paint. They announced that jazz was a world music with African, not European, roots.
Great Black Music — Ancient to the Future.
— Art Ensemble of Chicago, mottoFree jazz poses the sharpest version of the "I Am I" question: if you remove all external constraints — key, meter, chord changes, even the expectation of "jazz" sounds — what remains? Two answers emerged from the music. The first: what remains is noise, chaos, the self dissolved. The second — and this is what the best free jazz demonstrates — what remains is more intensely individual than anything constrained music allows. Ornette's "wrong" notes are more absolutely his than any technically correct bebop solo. Cecil Taylor's piano clusters contain a personality as distinct as a fingerprint. The freedom reveals rather than erases the self. It is "I Am I" stripped of all costume.
To understand Bitches Brew you have to understand what Miles Davis was listening to in 1968–69. He had moved to a house on West 77th Street in Manhattan and was being visited by Jimi Hendrix, Sly Stone, and James Brown. He was reading Nietzsche. He was watching funk bands like Larry Young's Universe. He was listening obsessively to the electronic production of Stockhausen. His producer, Teo Macero, was experimenting with studio editing and tape loops. Miles was forty-three years old and felt, as he said in his autobiography, that everyone in jazz was "looking backwards."
The recording sessions in August 1969 involved twelve musicians at times — two drummers, two or three keyboardists, electric bass, acoustic bass, guitars, trumpet, saxophones — playing simultaneously with no sheet music, no chord charts, often with no instruction beyond a rough key and a tempo. Macero recorded everything and edited the ninety-minute raw tapes into the final double album afterward, adding reverb, echo, and tape loops that transformed some passages almost beyond recognition.
The cover of Bitches Brew was painted by Mati Klarwein, the same artist who had painted the cover of Santana's Abraxas. It depicted a surrealist landscape with Black figures, water, lightning, and abstracted faces — psychedelic in the most literal sense, a disruption of ordinary perception. When it arrived in record stores in 1970, Columbia's salespeople didn't know which bin to put it in. Jazz? Rock? It sold 400,000 copies in its first year — more than any Miles Davis album except Kind of Blue. The jazz purists were furious. Miles didn't notice or didn't care, which amounted to the same thing.
The musicians who passed through Miles's electric bands in this period subsequently defined jazz for the next twenty years. Chick Corea formed Return to Forever. John McLaughlin formed the Mahavishnu Orchestra. Herbie Hancock moved toward funk-jazz with Head Hunters. Joe Zawinul and Wayne Shorter formed Weather Report. Keith Jarrett would later record the Köln Concert. Tony Williams formed Lifetime. It is one of the most extraordinary transfers of creative energy in music history — Miles as a kind of neutron star whose gravity bent trajectories, then propelled them outward.
The electric period raises the question of "I Am I" in a specifically modern form: what happens when the self chooses to become unrecognisable? Miles's jazz audience largely rejected the electric music. He had, to them, betrayed his identity. But this misreads the situation entirely. The constant reinvention was the identity — the refusal to be fixed by any single achievement. In Zen terms, if you meet the Buddha on the road, kill him. Miles killed every version of himself the moment it threatened to become a comfortable role. That is not the abandonment of "I Am I" — it is its most radical expression. The self that cannot be pinned down because it is always already moving.
I'll play it first and tell you what it is later.
— Miles DavisBy the mid-1970s, jazz had fractured irreparably. There was no longer a single conversation. Instead there were overlapping, sometimes hostile dialogues: the fusion mainstream (commercial, amplified, rhythm-driven); the "neoclassical" or neo-bop movement centred around Wynton Marsalis; the continuing avant-garde (AACM, European improvised music); and something new happening on a small German record label that would prove to have the longest creative half-life of all.
Manfred Eicher founded ECM in Munich in 1969 with a single phrase that became a kind of aesthetic manifesto: "the most beautiful sound next to silence." The label's production aesthetic was immediately distinctive — concert-hall clarity, long reverb trails, extraordinary dynamic range, an emphasis on space. ECM recordings don't sound like jazz recordings. They sound like the music is happening in a cathedral.
The artists Eicher chose were equally distinctive: Keith Jarrett, Jan Garbarek, Egberto Gismonti, Chick Corea's acoustic group, the Art Ensemble of Chicago, Paul Bley, Gary Burton, Ralph Towner, Charlie Haden's Liberation Music Orchestra, and dozens of European improvising musicians who had no other home. The label also, crucially, recorded Arvo Pärt, Steve Reich, and other minimalist classical composers — blurring the boundary between jazz and the European art tradition in both directions.
The Köln Concert should never have happened. Jarrett arrived to find that the wrong piano had been delivered to the Cologne Opera House — a small, under-powered Bösendorfer practice instrument with a sticking pedal and several inaudible notes in the middle register. He refused to play. A seventeen-year-old concert organiser named Vera Brandes, who had arranged the whole concert, persuaded him. He played for an hour and a half, working around the bad notes, partly by playing in the extreme upper and lower registers of the keyboard. The recording became the best-selling solo piano album in history. The limitations of the wrong piano shaped one of the most celebrated jazz recordings ever made.
In 1982, a twenty-one-year-old trumpet player from New Orleans won Grammy Awards in both the jazz and classical categories simultaneously. Wynton Marsalis was immensely talented, combatively articulate, and absolutely certain about what jazz was and was not. He believed fusion had been a betrayal, that free jazz was largely incoherent, and that the tradition established by Armstrong, Parker, Monk, and the hard bop masters was the standard against which all jazz should be measured.
His position at Lincoln Center gave him institutional power to match his convictions. The "Jazz Wars" of the late 1980s and 1990s — Marsalis vs. Miles Davis, Marsalis vs. the avant-garde, Marsalis vs. critics who disagreed — generated more argument about jazz's identity and purpose than anything since bebop. It was also, whatever one thinks of his aesthetic conservatism, an extraordinary act of institutional self-determination by an African American musician: seizing the commanding heights of the classical establishment to say, this music is ours, it has a tradition, it deserves preservation and study.
ECM presents a fascinating philosophical case. Eicher's musicians — Jarrett, Garbarek, Gismonti — are among the most distinctively individuated voices in improvised music. And yet the label's sound is so recognisable that all ECM recordings share something. Is this "I Am I" filtered through an aesthetic frame — a kind of beautiful Ketman, the self expressed within the constraints of a house aesthetic? Or is it that Eicher finds artists whose "I Am I" naturally resonates with his sense of beauty? The label never sounds generic. But it also never sounds fully wild. It is, perhaps, ECM's defining tension — total individuality within extraordinary self-discipline. The silence is real. But someone chose the reverb settings.
Let us be honest about the situation. Jazz is not a dominant popular music. It has not been since roughly 1955. It does not produce artists who regularly fill arenas or dominate streaming charts. Its major commercial peaks — Kind of Blue, the Köln Concert, Bitches Brew — were achieved decades ago. Jazz education is robust, but the relationship between jazz education and jazz creativity has always been tense; the music that gets trained is often the music of the past.
And yet. Every obituary for jazz has proven premature, and for the same reason: the musical form is too generative, too philosophically open, too deeply woven into the creative aspirations of musicians across the world to simply stop. Something keeps happening.
In the 2010s and 2020s, a genuine renewal emerged in several cities simultaneously, particularly London, Los Angeles, and New York. In London, a scene centred around the Barbican, Total Refreshment Centre, and venues in Dalston produced musicians like Shabaka Hutchings (Sons of Kemet, The Comet is Coming), Nubya Garcia, Moses Boyd, Theon Cross, and Zara McFarlane — music that drew on Caribbean, West African, and electronic music while remaining irreducibly improvisatory and soulful.
In Los Angeles, Kamasi Washington's The Epic (2015) — a triple album of post-Coltrane spiritual jazz — sold tens of thousands of copies and introduced jazz to audiences who had never engaged with the tradition. Thundercat, Terrace Martin, and the musicians around Kendrick Lamar demonstrated that the boundary between jazz improvisation and hip-hop production had essentially dissolved for the generation that grew up with both.
In 2016, Kendrick Lamar's To Pimp a Butterfly won the Grammy for Best Rap Album. The album featured extensive improvised jazz by musicians including Thundercat, Robert Glasper, Kamasi Washington, and Terrace Martin — players who moved between jazz sessions and hip-hop production without apparent strain. Several jazz critics noted that the album was, in important respects, a jazz album. Several hip-hop critics noted the same thing with different implications. It had sold over a million copies. Miles Davis's ghost, somewhere, was presumably satisfied.
Jazz cannot die because the conditions that produced it remain constant. Human beings improvise. They respond to each other in real time. They carry personal histories into shared spaces and find, sometimes, that those histories create something neither one of them could have made alone. The conversation between Charlie Parker and Dizzy Gillespie, between Miles and Coltrane, between Ornette and Don Cherry, between Elvin Jones's drums and Coltrane's tenor — these are not technical achievements. They are demonstrations of a fundamental human capacity.
Moreover, jazz has never been geographically confined to America. Norwegian saxophonist Jan Garbarek sounds like Norwegian fjords. Brazilian guitarist Egberto Gismonti sounds like the Amazon basin. Japanese pianist Masabumi Kikuchi — whose Tethered Moon recordings are among the most poetically delicate documents in the music — sounds like no one else alive. The music went everywhere and became local everywhere. That is not dilution. That is a tradition absorbing the world.
Jazz is not just music. It is a way of life, it is a way of looking at the world.
— Wynton MarsalisWe have been asking throughout this series whether jazz embodies the "I Am I" principle — the unmediated, self-sufficient identity that requires no external reference point, no role, no institution to validate it.
The answer is: jazz is the art form that has most consistently demanded it.
Every great jazz musician has been, in some essential way, unclassifiable. Bird was not bebop — bebop was Bird. Monk was not Monk-style — the style was Monk. Coltrane was not a genre — genres tried to catch up with him and never could. Miles was not any period of Miles Davis — he was always already somewhere else. Coleman was not free jazz — he was Ornette, and harmolodics was the name he gave to the shape his selfhood made when it moved through music.
The musicians who failed — who became comfortable, institutional, predictable — stopped being jazz musicians in the deepest sense even if they continued to play jazz notes. The tradition punishes Ketman eventually. You cannot wear the wig forever in this music without the wig becoming your face.
And this is why jazz is not dead. It is not dead because the impulse it embodies — to say I am I through sound, in real time, with other human beings — is not dead. It never will be. It is the oldest impulse in music and the newest. Before there were instruments, there was a person making a sound that no one had made before, discovering as they made it that it was theirs.
That is where jazz begins. It has never left.
We planted two figures at the beginning of these lectures as tuning forks, and it is time to bring them back.
Gary Snyder — poet, Zen practitioner, the last living connection to the Beat Generation — translates Han Shan's Cold Mountain poems: the hermit at the still centre of the mountain, finding there nothing and therefore everything. Snyder lays riprap on a trail in the Sierra Nevada — rough stones, patient work, no ornament. The work is the man. The man is the work. No separation between them, no self-watching-self. That is the condition Han Shan describes and Snyder enacts. It is also the condition every great jazz solo reaches for in its best moments.
Now: John Coltrane picks up the soprano saxophone and plays "My Favourite Things" until it is no longer a Rodgers and Hammerstein show tune but a devotional act that lasts sixteen minutes and sounds like rain on a mountain. Charlie Parker plays "Cherokee" so fast that the chord changes dissolve into pure melodic thought and what remains is the shape of his mind. Ornette Coleman picks up his white plastic alto and plays notes that the textbook says are wrong, and they are absolutely right because they are absolutely him.
These are not different activities from Snyder. They are the same activity across different materials, different centuries, different cultures. A self declaring itself through form. Refusing to be reduced to the form. Using the form as pure transparency — so that what you hear is not jazz, not the soprano saxophone, not the tune, but the person. The still point at the centre. Nothing, which turns out to be everything.
The beboppers at Minton's in 1942 were not playing jazz. They were playing themselves, in a language they were inventing as they went. Jazz happened as a byproduct. The real event — the one that has never stopped — was the I Am I.
Don't play what's there. Play what's not there.
— Miles DavisThere is a type of establishment in Japan called a jazz kissa — a jazz café. It is not a café in any sense a Westerner would recognise. You do not talk in a jazz kissa. You sit, you order coffee, and you listen. The proprietor — typically a man who has spent thirty years accumulating vinyl, a turntable, and an amplifier of almost religious quality — selects the records. The speakers are large, expensive, and precisely positioned. The room is hushed. When a Miles Davis solo reaches its peak, no one looks up from their coffee, but the air in the room changes. This is jazz listened to the way the Japanese listen to everything that matters: with the whole body, in silence, as a practice.
Japan discovered jazz in the 1920s, initially through American musicians performing in Osaka and Tokyo. It was interrupted by the war and the American Occupation, during which jazz was simultaneously the music of the enemy and the music of liberation — a paradox that gave it a particular charge in the Japanese cultural imagination. By the 1950s, jazz was everywhere in urban Japan, absorbed with the same disciplined enthusiasm the culture had brought to everything it decided to study seriously: ceramics, martial arts, Zen, now this.
Before the musicians, a word about the Japanese relationship to sound reproduction itself, because it is inseparable from the story. Japan became, in the 1960s and 1970s, the world's primary manufacturer of high-fidelity audio equipment and the world's most demanding market for it. The major American jazz labels — Blue Note, Impulse!, Prestige, Columbia — licensed their catalogues to Japanese labels who pressed them with a care for vinyl quality and mastering that the American originals sometimes lacked. Japanese Blue Note pressings from the 1970s are today among the most sought-after records on the collector market, valued above the American originals for their sonic qualities. The Japanese SACD releases of jazz classics — from Sony Music Japan and the audiophile label Esoteric — apply the same philosophy to the digital era: maximum resolution, maximum care, the recording treated as a sacred text that deserves the most faithful possible transcription.
This is not merely consumerism. It reflects a deep cultural belief that the act of listening, done seriously, is itself a form of practice — that the gap between a careless and a careful rendering of the same music is morally significant. If that sounds like an audiophile's rationalisation, consider that it is also exactly what the jazz musicians themselves believed about the difference between playing carelessly and playing with full presence.
In 1953, Oscar Peterson was performing at a jazz festival in Japan when he heard a young woman play piano in a bar in Tokyo. He was so astonished that he tracked down the club owner and asked who she was. Her name was Toshiko Akiyoshi. She was twenty-three years old, born in Manchuria, classically trained, and had taught herself to play jazz from recordings. Peterson personally arranged for her to receive a scholarship to the Berklee College of Music in Boston — the first Japanese student to attend. She went on to co-lead one of the greatest big bands in jazz history, the Toshiko Akiyoshi-Lew Tabackin Big Band, whose recordings from the 1970s remain among the most ambitious and fully realised large-ensemble jazz ever made. The compositions draw on Japanese traditional music — particularly the scale structures and timbres of gagaku court music — filtered through Ellington-era big band writing. It sounds like nothing else. It sounds like her.
Of all the Japanese jazz musicians, the one whose work most directly inhabits the philosophical territory of these lectures is Masabumi Kikuchi. Born in Tokyo in 1939, he studied at the Berklee College of Music in the same years as Toshiko Akiyoshi, returned to Japan, and built a career as a pianist, composer, and bandleader that placed him at the forefront of the Japanese jazz scene through the 1970s and 1980s. But it is his later work — particularly the series of trio recordings he made as "Tethered Moon" with the American drummer Paul Motian and bassist Charlie Haden — that places him in the company of the great ECM artists.
The Tethered Moon recordings — made in the 1990s in the ECM tradition of near-silence and vast acoustic space — are among the most poetically delicate documents in improvised music. Kikuchi's piano style in these years became progressively more spare: long silences, single notes allowed to decay fully before the next thought, a quality of attention that makes most Western jazz piano sound crowded. He was not imitating Bill Evans, though the lineage is audible. He had absorbed Evans and then gone somewhere Evans never went — further east, into a silence that had a specifically Japanese quality, a patience that American music rarely possesses.
The drummer Paul Motian — himself one of the most distinctive voices in jazz, famous for his work with Bill Evans and then his own ECM recordings — first met Masabumi Kikuchi in New York in the early 1980s. They began playing together informally, and Motian later said in an interview that Kikuchi was the only pianist he had played with since Bill Evans who seemed to understand that a note left unmade was as important as a note played. The silence in Kikuchi's music was not hesitation or incompetence. It was structural — the same role that negative space plays in a Japanese ink painting, where the unpainted areas carry as much meaning as the brushwork. When the Tethered Moon trio performed, audiences sometimes held their breath between phrases, uncertain whether the music had ended or was merely resting. It was nearly always resting.
Japanese jazz is not monolithic, and it would be misleading to suggest that all of it tends toward the contemplative. Yosuke Yamashita — pianist, composer, force of nature — represents the other pole entirely. His trio recordings from the 1970s on the German Enja label are among the most physically intense piano performances in the music: thunderous, percussive, drawing on free jazz, Cecil Taylor, and something distinctly Japanese that resists easy categorisation. He once performed a concert in a burning building — literally, with controlled fires around the piano — as a comment on the relationship between creation and destruction. This is not the jazz kissa aesthetic. This is Mingus energy filtered through Tokyo.
Both Kikuchi and Yamashita are "I Am I" musicians in the fullest sense. They are Japanese jazzmen, but the adjective is almost redundant — what you hear first, and last, is not their nationality or their genre but their irreducible individuality. They answered the same call Parker and Monk answered, in a different language, from a different place, arriving at the same destination.
The Japanese relationship to jazz raises a question that gets to the heart of the "I Am I" concept at a cultural rather than individual level. When a Japanese musician plays jazz, are they appropriating a foreign form, or becoming themselves through it? The question sounds like it should generate a long argument, but the music answers it directly: listen to Masabumi Kikuchi and tell me whether what you hear is Japanese or jazz. The answer is that it is completely both, which means it is completely neither, which means it is completely itself. The form has been absorbed so entirely that it has become transparent — a vehicle for a selfhood that could not have found this particular voice without it.
This is exactly what Gary Snyder did with Han Shan's Chinese mountain poetry. The form does not belong to you and then, through long discipline and complete attention, it does — not because you have conquered it but because you have surrendered to it so fully that the distinction between self and form dissolves. What remains is the music, and the music is entirely you.
When I play, I am not playing jazz. I am playing music. Jazz is just the name for the room I found myself in.
— Masabumi KikuchiThe Japanese jazz tradition offers the most sustained demonstration in these lectures of "I Am I" operating at the cultural level. A tradition born in New Orleans, formed in Harlem, reaches Tokyo and Sapporo and Osaka — and instead of producing imitation, produces something new, something that could only have come from this particular encounter between the music and this particular culture. The jazz kissa listener, sitting in reverent silence before a good pressing of Kind of Blue, is not being reverential about America. They are enacting the Japanese understanding that the highest form of attention is the highest form of respect — and that listening, done with full presence, is itself a form of becoming. I am I: and what I am, this evening, in this room, with this music, is exactly this.
For the serious listener, the Japanese SACD releases of classic jazz deserve special attention. Sony Music Japan and the audiophile label Esoteric have produced SACD editions of canonical recordings — Coltrane's A Love Supreme, Miles Davis's Kind of Blue, and much of the Blue Note catalogue — that represent the state of the art in high-resolution jazz reproduction. The Esoteric releases in particular, remastered directly from the original master tapes with extraordinary care, offer the closest experience currently available to hearing what was actually in the room when these records were made. They are expensive, they are limited edition, and they are worth every yen. The Japanese audiophile tradition and the Japanese jazz tradition converge here in a single object: the belief that the music deserves the most faithful possible vessel, and that the act of listening is worth doing properly.
Leave a comment on this series. Requires a free GitHub account.